StickyDrama
What devilry is this? A young woman who isn’t Felice Fawn dares to speak out against Freelice?
Freelice is beginning to experience the Internet’s usual way of handling anyone who attracts a large audience: introducing you a billion folks who think you’re full of shit.
Don’t worry, girls, it happens to the best of us.

What devilry is this? A young woman who isn’t Felice Fawn dares to speak out against Freelice?

Freelice is beginning to experience the Internet’s usual way of handling anyone who attracts a large audience: introducing you a billion folks who think you’re full of shit.

Don’t worry, girls, it happens to the best of us.

i reblog a blog that keeps saying im some freelice blog called feliceflawed or w.e? i dont own a freelice blog. theyre uploading photos of me and making fun of the way i look. im very upset.

the-truth-about-felice-fawn:

deamhan:

the-truth-about-felice-fawn:

You’re talking about la-porte-jarretelles right? Don’t worry, love. Just ignore them. They are still trying to stir up drama and get attention. But in reality, they are only showing how shallow and petty they really are, and also how horrendously poor their arguing skills are.

For what it’s worth, I think you’re gorgeous. And I’m certain I’m not the only one.

aW THANKS yeah im just dumbfounded they think i owned feliceflawed when they had a list of their admins on it?? but thank you will do i guess :-( i already sent them an ask politely asking to remove the photos but they’ve yet to do so 

Yeah, sadly they probably won’t remove the photos despite you asking politely. Just report the posts. I will do the same (and I encourage anyone reading to do so as well!).

When I was recently “doxed” by another useless, trifling blogger, la-porte-jarretelles re-posted the info even though I said right when it happened that the doxing info was not me and that was not my picture. So it’s not surprising to me that they believe you own a blog that you don’t. They’re just grasping at straws since they really sunk their whole ~mission~ against Freelice shortly after appearing in the tags. Having cohesive arguments and even being remotely correct in their information is apparently of little importance to them.

Like I said, they just keep showing what a sorry, desperate POS they really are. Just ignore them. You have NO reason to feel bad about yourself, though I totally understand why it is freaking you out. Just know that they are revealing more about themselves than they ever could about you. ;)

And everyone in prison is really innocent. Not surprising that everyone screams “NOT ME!” in these unpleasant situations. Unfortunately, almost nothing is clear-cut or absolute. When shit hits the fan, we are compelled to determine who is responsible by interpreting the evidence available at the time. Maybe that girl really does not operate any Freelice blog; but I can certain see evidence that she does, and no one will know for sure until the actual operator identifies herself. Your advice to that girl was nice. But nicer still would be to exonerate her revealing who does operate all the Freelice blogs.

Moreover, why don’t any Freelicers ever provide a legitimate reason for hiding their identity? Do you think that I am going to come kill you in your sleep and dip you in syrup for breakfast? Nonsense. I never physically harmed any of the bitches I exposed on efagz, although I did make life a tad miserable for them until they backed the fuck off my grill. 

By your reasoning, no one could be an investigative journalistic without working anonymously. Nor could we have any reporters: everyone should be too afraid of being killed by the subject of a critical news story. Yet not only do we have journalists and reporters who work under their real name; but anonymous reporters have zero credibility in journalism.

And your casual “I just don’t feel like it” is obviously bullshit. Provide a legitimate reason. You must have a reason for guarding something so closely for so long that is more complex than, “oh just cuz.”

We all know the reason. But we nevertheless want to hear you say it: "I don’t want to be held accountable for all the shit I post."

felicesaidwhut:

felolenenok:

lol come at me bro I saw you just started following me- ‘stickydrama’- and if you’re going to threaten freelice why not start with me eh? you’re about as threatening as a chainletter warning me of ‘untold bad luck’ if I don’t forward to ‘7 friends right away!!’.

You are way…

I’ve got a simple statement to reply to your bs Chris, it’s this.
A ‘freelicers’ identity has absolutely no relevance to them telling the truth about Felice Fawn. 
A ‘freelicer’ being anonymous doesn’t make everything they say a lie. And giving out their info doesn’t stop Felice from being a pile of crap.
Thank you, and goodnight!

Anyone with an advanced education knows that your first two points are  incorrect.

A person’s identity has everything to do with his or her motivations and worldview. No one is capable of pure logical reason uncolored by emotions, prejudice, past experience; and even if such a human exists, he or she does not waste time posting about Felice Fawn. Freelicers are immature bitches on tumblr, not autistic savants in Rain Man. For this reason, lawyers attempt to make their arguments before a judge whose background will make for a sympathetic decision-maker in a case. And let’s be honest, those Freelicers whose identity has been exposed have always been far less photogenic than Felice, which reinforces the jealousy angle. Maybe all the remaining Freelicers really are as I’ve seen them write: sexy goddesses who want impressionable young girls to know that voluptuous women are more attractive than unhealthy toothpicks. But without knowing who they are, they might just as likely be jealous cunts.

Anonymous sources are furthermore notoriously unreliable and accordingly deserve very little credibility.  Not to be the stereotypical law student, but again, in Evidence anonymous sources are given very little weight. Sure, not everythingthat Freelicers say is a lie. But nearly all of it is highly suspect. I know, you provide “proof” for all your claims. No you don’t. You provide evidence, which you then interpret by drawing inferences. And your identity is a huge factor in making those inferences. I find most Freelicers’ interpretations to be very biased, irrationally so.

Those two points are taught in law school, but you don’t need to be a lawyer to know the truth. Google is your friend.

As for Felice, she is only remotely related to my point. I have repeatedly stated that I do not have a high opinion of her. But I have a much worse opinion of Freelice’s tactics, and individual Freelicers will indeed temper their conduct with a dose of practical self-interest once their identity is known to the subjects of their so-called truth. I have seen this unsurprising phenomenon occur many times on Stickam, and you Freelicers also noticed it on tumblr when dishonfreelice worked his or her magic. The simple truth is that people behave like savage animals whenever they risk no accountability or consequences for their actions.

Freelicers abuse their anonymity by acting far crueler than they will dare once their identity is known. But nothing is really anonymous on the internet. If anyone really wants to find you, they can. You just have to provide a reason. And Freelicers’ actions are reason enough for me.

Finally, you can huff and puff and say YOU’RE STUPID, MR. STICKYDRAMA all you want. But simply refuting my point is not very convincing. If shame and fear do not cause you to cling to your precious anonymity, then why do you? Why hide if you have nothing to fear? Why not attach your name to your supposedly noble cause? What say you to that?

felolenenok:

Working til 930 will respond later sweet cheeks.

Looking forward to it, honey buns.

felolenenok:

lol come at me bro I saw you just started following me- ‘stickydrama’- and if you’re going to threaten freelice why not start with me eh? you’re about as threatening as a chainletter warning me of ‘untold bad luck’ if I don’t forward to ‘7 friends right away!!’.

You are way too defensive. Seriously.

Calm the fuck down or go see a specialist.

Oh? OK.

I read on your blog that you never walk away from any argument, but you could not articulate any rational response to my previous post. I hope that you can respond to a shorter, easier argument without resorting to juvenile insults. Otherwise you remain the same faceless, nameless annoyance that characterizes all Freelicers.

My full legal name is Christopher Stone, and I claim that you are too afraid  to identify yourself by name, publicly, as I just did. I also claim that you, like all Freelicers, are too afraid to lend any legitimacy to your campaign against Felice Fawn by attaching your name to it.

Will you prove me wrong by simply identifying yourself? Or will you continue to hide under the same veil of anonymity that makes Freelice nothing but a group of immature young women, who try so hard to convince themselves that they are something better than a bunch of silly little girls?

I have no personal animosity towards you in particular and, in the highly unlikely scenario that you demonstrate a spine, I will not act against you in any way for anything that you have ever done before this point. I make no such guarantee for the subjects of your posts, but that is more or less my point.

And Now It’s Time For A Breakdown On D0X-DROPPING

"I don’t care what your opinion is on anything. Posting anyone’s personal information, such as phone number and address, REGARDLESS OF WHO THEY ARE, makes you an absolute piece of shit who needs to straighten their life out."

Hi there! :D

I recently addressed this issue in a submission to my colleague La Porte-Jarretelles, but hey, why not piss off all you vicious little cunts on my own blog too.

I am not unaware of the moral dilemma involved in d0x-dropping. Mostly when I operated StickyDrama on Wordpress, my critics leveled accusations of “vigilante justice” against me, as if d0xing were cruel torture that is never appropriate. Even if the subject of the drop were a vile monster, say a child molester—which I admit is an extreme example, but an extreme example is necessary to refute your extreme position that d0x-dropping is never appropriate—then the argument nevertheless goes that only law enforcement and courts should take action. I reject that argument.

Also while I operated StickyDrama on Wordpress, among the thousands of hateful posts and emails, on occasion I received a desperate cry for help. Why on earth anyone would come to a tabloid writer for help, who knows? Despite StickyDrama’s “adults only” disclaimer, my site had many very young readers who idolized me. They often told me that StickyDrama was the only thing they read as a hobby, like their newspaper. You hear that kids don’t tell their parents or teachers anything, but once you’re in a position where kids do open up to you, the truth of that statement is really striking. For example, how is some boy in a trailer park going to tell his white trash redneck parents that some pedophile screen-recorded him masturbating? And he was masturbating to a video loop that he thought was another young boy, because PS, he’s gay. And he had already been blackmailed into performing hours of sex acts, each of which was more perverse than the last, day after day. These are the types of messages I received, and they moved even a dirty cocksucker like me when a very young child was being abused in horrible ways. And do you really think that most adults would not place at least some blame on the child? Webcams never existed when today’s adults were children, so how can anyone really identify with a generation growing up on the Internet? If not for my website, I would probably think “stupid kid” or “asking for it” too. So I felt compelled to help. I know, I know; cue the violins. But, while I will not mention specific cases, they really did occur, and although they were not common, they were not rare, either.

Now, if we consider the much more common case of harassment and stalking, as well as nearly every other type of crime that occurs on the Internet, police departments are loathe to get involved in what they perceive as merely online drama. Even in the case of very serious crimes, local agencies rarely have the resources to handle all so-called real crimes, much less those that take place online.  And among those federal agencies that do actually have the motivation and wherewithal to intervene, usually the enormity of the crime must reach monstrous proportions before any action occurs—certainly more abuse than anyone should endure. But let’s keep to our extreme example and make the fantastical assumption that law enforcement would actually act without the delay of tedious paperwork and painstaking investigation, immediately upon receiving a complaint. Still, the odds of the most likely victims—children—lodging a complaint are exceedingly rare, because they are most likely embarrassed by whatever their abuser is using as leverage against them. Even when someone could at least confide in me, I was frustrated insofar as no law enforcement agency would accept a complaint made by me on behalf of another. And I couldn’t exactly fire a stream of bullets into someone’s house (figuratively speaking). Even if I would accept the legal consequences of doling out real, physically harmful vigilante justice, which I wouldn’t, how could I know that only the abuser would suffer? Furthermore, these creatures were always far far away, often in remote areas, so cost and feasibility were concerns. D0xing, which I first observed as a weapon among the hacker community like Digital Gangster, appealed to all my concerns acting as the Internet’s judge, jury and executioner.

To this day, I continue to believe that d0xing certain malicious individuals is a public service that was one tiny bright light in StickyDrama’s ocean of dark humor. Let’s be realistic: d0xing is not the death penalty. It embarrasses or terrifies the subject, but also empowers and saves potential victims, who can much more easily report specific allegations against an identified perpetrator to the appropriate authority. And if I were mistaken or unsure about someone’s culpability (which did happen with some posts, but never in a d0x-drop) no physical harm is done and a retraction can cure most if not all the innocent subject’s reputational harm. Also, d0xing is not a crime, whatever your opinion may be, so accusations of “vigilante justice” are more metaphorical than literal with d0xing.  All in all, when used judiciously, the evil of d0xing is far outweighed by the good. By publicly identifying a notorious villain, d0xing prevents future harm; StickyDrama was widely read by the most likely victims, and once Sticky had posted about so-and-so, timid kids either felt the courage to stop their victimization by alerting law enforcement, or would allow me to guide them as they made the initial complaint; and best of all, most abusers disappeared into obscurity after their d0x-drop anyway.

So, while I agree that d0x-dropping is unmerited in minor disputes, I cannot see a better way to respond to egregious harm that takes place on the Internet. And if you disagree, that’s all well and good; but opinions are like assholes, and while I have been known to chow down on an asshole or two (or three), simply shoving your opinion down my throat without offering any practical alternative to d0xing is hurting more victims than are “harmed” by d0xing. Let me expand on that point, since I’m making a factual assertion without any citation to evidence: Because I have to deal with all the bullshit that attends being a public figure who operated a big bad gossip blog, for once I claim the benefit of being a public figure who has the credentials to assert that d0xing an abusive Internet user, in the aggregate, prevents more harm than it causes. Spare me naive suggestions like “call 911.” Anyone who has ever called 911 on me for d0xing them will without hesitation inform you that calling 911 is totally ineffective. D0xing works, and it works instantly. Will anyone really argue that some cunt’s outrage that she can no longer run her mouth without getting a tap on the shoulder is more serious than what a boy or girl feels when some old man demands that he or she have sex with the family pet?

A certain someone once described d0xing as a warning: “I know who you are and where you live.” Yes, that’s exactly what it is. Anonymity is a valuable tool to promote the exchange of ideas, but it is just as likely to be exploited in violation of someone’s rights. And if you annoy me enough, I will find you. And come after you. And make you stop annoying me. Whether I do that by knocking on your door and telling you to shut the fuck up, or by calling the police to report a crime, depends on the context. While I can see how you would prefer that your victims or targets remain powerless in the face of your harassment or stalking or sexual blackmail, the ultimate reality is that I don’t have to play by your rules. I can tear away your anonymity and eat it for brunch if I want to—and if you push me hard enough, I will want to. Expecting me to sit at my computer and let you pull your shit to your heart’s content is about as stupid as expecting me to let you punch me in the kisser until your knuckles bleed. The fear of the repercussions to my conduct is what keeps me from acting in a manner that will get my ass thrown in a jail cell, not your opinions of morality or ethics; and I am happy to instill that same fear in anyone who has delusions of invincibility.

Including you, Freelice.

Why are you so concerned with the freelice community all of a sudden?

Contrary to popular belief, I do have morals, and Freelice offends them. I acknowledge that my sense of morality is not the herd’s, but on this issue I believe that any reasonable person will agree with my position.

First, they abuse anonymity. I push the envelope under my true identity, but I do not act without regard to the consequences of my actions. I do take risks that sometimes have unpleasant results, but nothing that I am unwilling to accept and roll with if necessary. Meanwhile, Felice is comprised of numerous young women acting like vicious immature girls in high school, because they believe that their anonymity is absolute. I love whenever one of their group is “outed”—which you might have noticed is growing increasingly popular—because it is human nature to enjoy when arrogance receives its comeuppance. Their outraged reactions are pretty funny. As if the rest of the world is supposed to take their shit without resistance.

Next, every aspect of their mission is ridiculous. They devote an obsessive amount of time, in coordinated effort, to persecuting a harmless young woman for no other reason than jealousy; they exaggerate minor details into drama that is not worth the effort of clicking the “publish” button; they make unreasonable inferences in order to fabricate a Jurassic Park nightmare for nearly every mundane aspect of Felice’s life; and god forbid that anyone dispute their version of the so-called truth. They are zealots, like religious fundamentalists wasting everyone’s time by begging that we all accept as truth something that does not exist.

But perhaps most nauseating is Freelice’s pretext of “social justice” (shouts out to La Porte-Jarretelles). They deny that they are jealous of Felice, and claim to denounce her “thinspo” and expose her “scam” online stores. I can see how dismissing their arguments as jealousy seems to ignore their more well-reasoned points, like an ad hominem attack. But whenever one of their members is exposed, and you see who is the person publishing all these juvenile rants about a thin attractive young woman, life experience points to a very simple explanation. Jealous bitches, simple as that. Freelice’s individual arguments are not inherently irrational or clearly erroneous, but exposing their identities reveals that the real issue isn’t any of their arguments at all. Considering a source is not the same as making an ad hominem attack.

I do not wish to be perceived as defending Felice, so much as rejecting Freelice’s claims and profoundly disagreeing with their tactics. I was goth in my formative years, and am still fond of the sub-culture’s general outlook; although I don’t wear black velvet and makeup any longer, anyone who’s visited StickyHouse knows my dark decor and decadent tastes. And as far as goths go, Felice strikes me as one of those “Hot Topic goths” whom the Victorian period goths love to hate. But whatever criticism that Felice deserves, it’s just that: criticism. Talk about her all you want, but for Christ’s sake, don’t harass the poor thing! She hasn’t killed anyone (Mama Kannibal) or raped anyone (Hock) or apparently done anything worse than deliver plastic trinkets a few weeks late. By practically building online temples consecrated to hating Felice, Freelice makes her much more important than she really is.

Freelicers are fond of saying of Felice’s fans, “if they don’t they truth, then they must be forced to see the truth.” I am fond of my own proverb: “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

la-porte-jarretelles:

You know I’m actually starting to feel a little bit sorry for her.I have not said one negative thing about this girls looks, not one thing, but so far the messages I’ve received from Freelicers and Freelice supporters are things like :"So you’re basically saying that all Freelicers are ugly?"I never said this girl was ugly in the first place."Oh honey if only you knew *winky face*”Soooo you think you’re more attractive than her?I even got one Anon commenting on the Feliiceflawed’s weight and how I am “automatically assuming all Freelicers are fat” which I will not publish due to my own experiences with an eating disorder, but I’d like to know how that Anon was even aware of Feliiceflawed’s weight in the first place seeing as the only images I published of her are from the shoulders up.I feel sorry for her because the reality of this is that it’s not me that’s attacking her looks in any way, but actually the people she’s supposed to be receiving support from, and I think that’s very cruel.Instead of making these self-preservative, backhanded comments about how you’re so much better looking than this young lady why aren’t I receiving a  flood of comments saying things like “Feliiceflawed is a babe”? Not one single comment telling me to take them down but instead “HOW DARE YOU I AM SO MUCH BETTER LOOKING!”.The reason I published a few images of these girls is because I don’t think it’s right to have Freelicers criticising every thing in regards to Felice’s looks, her clothing, the way she poses, her expressions, the texture of her hair, the volume of her hair, how many teeth she has in her skull etcetera. etcetera.I don’t think it’s right that you should be allowed to criticise every last inch of her looks only to be able to enjoy the luxury of anonymity, but once again Freelicers in their vanity simply couldn’t bear being compared to somebody who they deemed to be lesser than them, regardless of the fact that she was actually one of them, and immediately shot her down.

"I don’t think it’s right that you should be allowed to criticise every last inch of her looks only to be able to enjoy the luxury of anonymity…."
Exactly.  Freelicers exploit anonymity beyond criticism to outright abuse in the name of their perverse “social justice,” and I am so relieved that someone else can see the monstrously unfair tactics that they use.  And moreover that she has the courage to speak out about it.  Because it takes courage to publish an opinion knowing that torrents of anonymous venom and hate will follow.  I have never encountered a group like Freelice, who act in unity like legions of anonymous Eichmanns carrying out screen caps and blog posts.
I talk shit, granted.  But I have always directed my criticism towards someone’s actions, not their appearance—unless, in certain cases, the subject has an intentionally extreme style.  And even then, those actions that I do write about tend to be crimes or very dramatic events.  But Freelicers hunt Felice as if she were Casey Anthony, following her every move (well, post), cherry-picking and distorting her each and every word into their outrage-du-jour, interpreting the most mundane details of a young woman’s life as the crime of the century.  For simple tweets that she has a runny nose or that she feels like lying down!
I have no particular love for Felice.  Or for whoever operates La Porte-Jarretelles.  But I despise Freelice’s conduct—it’s definitely cruel and probably criminal.

la-porte-jarretelles:

You know I’m actually starting to feel a little bit sorry for her.
I have not said one negative thing about this girls looks, not one thing, but so far the messages I’ve received from Freelicers and Freelice supporters are things like :

"So you’re basically saying that all Freelicers are ugly?"

I never said this girl was ugly in the first place.

"Oh honey if only you knew
*winky face*”

Soooo you think you’re more attractive than her?

I even got one Anon commenting on the Feliiceflawed’s weight and how I am “automatically assuming all Freelicers are fat” which I will not publish due to my own experiences with an eating disorder, but I’d like to know how that Anon was even aware of Feliiceflawed’s weight in the first place seeing as the only images I published of her are from the shoulders up.

I feel sorry for her because the reality of this is that it’s not me that’s attacking her looks in any way, but actually the people she’s supposed to be receiving support from, and I think that’s very cruel.
Instead of making these self-preservative, backhanded comments about how you’re so much better looking than this young lady why aren’t I receiving a  flood of comments saying things like “Feliiceflawed is a babe”? Not one single comment telling me to take them down but instead “HOW DARE YOU I AM SO MUCH BETTER LOOKING!”.

The reason I published a few images of these girls is because I don’t think it’s right to have Freelicers criticising every thing in regards to Felice’s looks, her clothing, the way she poses, her expressions, the texture of her hair, the volume of her hair, how many teeth she has in her skull etcetera. etcetera.
I don’t think it’s right that you should be allowed to criticise every last inch of her looks only to be able to enjoy the luxury of anonymity, but once again Freelicers in their vanity simply couldn’t bear being compared to somebody who they deemed to be lesser than them, regardless of the fact that she was actually one of them, and immediately shot her down.

"I don’t think it’s right that you should be allowed to criticise every last inch of her looks only to be able to enjoy the luxury of anonymity…."

Exactly.  Freelicers exploit anonymity beyond criticism to outright abuse in the name of their perverse “social justice,” and I am so relieved that someone else can see the monstrously unfair tactics that they use.  And moreover that she has the courage to speak out about it.  Because it takes courage to publish an opinion knowing that torrents of anonymous venom and hate will follow.  I have never encountered a group like Freelice, who act in unity like legions of anonymous Eichmanns carrying out screen caps and blog posts.

I talk shit, granted.  But I have always directed my criticism towards someone’s actions, not their appearance—unless, in certain cases, the subject has an intentionally extreme style.  And even then, those actions that I do write about tend to be crimes or very dramatic events.  But Freelicers hunt Felice as if she were Casey Anthony, following her every move (well, post), cherry-picking and distorting her each and every word into their outrage-du-jour, interpreting the most mundane details of a young woman’s life as the crime of the century.  For simple tweets that she has a runny nose or that she feels like lying down!

I have no particular love for Felice.  Or for whoever operates La Porte-Jarretelles.  But I despise Freelice’s conduct—it’s definitely cruel and probably criminal.

More harassment in my tumblr inbox sent by Laura Southworth.  Cuckoo for Cocoa Cocks!

More harassment in my tumblr inbox sent by Laura Southworth.  Cuckoo for Cocoa Cocks!

samswittyusername:

cryok:

I WILL NEVER NOT REBLOG THIS CUTE ASS COMIC

I feel like the amount of times this is on my blog is not legal.

I’ve gotta remember this trick.

samswittyusername:

cryok:

I WILL NEVER NOT REBLOG THIS CUTE ASS COMIC

I feel like the amount of times this is on my blog is not legal.

I’ve gotta remember this trick.