StickyDrama
Oh man, i'm so glad i found this again. StickyDrama was the shit (or is the shit, your choice) when MySpace was still hot.

I prefer to believe that linear time—with a past, present and future—is an illusion; that all moments in eternity are part of the same existence; and therefore StickyDrama is always the shit.

First off I wanted to say you are teh hottest thing to hit the net since Jeffree Star. Secondly I wanted to let you know that I am your new stalker. Thirdly! I was off in lala land when MySpace and the 'Scene' was big, can you fill me in on what fun I missed?~
Anonymous

All three of your points make me want to find you, barf all over you and then kill you. 

Can this classist “Stickydrama” douche be reported for harassment?

You can report me until your fingers bleed from typing. The legal definition of harassment requires specific elements that my actions will not meet.

My age does not invalidate anything, although I’m disappointed that you were too chickenshit even to try, felolenenok. And I’m glad that you know exactly who I am, because now you know what’s coming for you. Moreover, by avoiding the issue of your identity, you’ve confirmed that under the veil of anonymity you are indeed a bunch of scared little girls. You think that anonymity is invincibility, but you’re very wrong, ladies. Wrong, and weak. All you little bitches can do is orchestrate coordinated attacks, which I grant can be highly annoying; but you have no clue how to defend yourselves.

So what will you do when shit gets real? Report me to the tumblr police? To the real police? Go right ahead: I haven’t done anything that would result in any action against me by law enforcement. You can’t even get this tumblr account banned! And what can you post about me that hasn’t been posted already? All you little bitches can do is gossip, whereas I can shatter your lives—your real, offline lives—into a million pieces. Lives can end in ways that do not constitute a crime in any legal sense.

You’re about to have a much bigger problem than a thin goth who photoshops herself.

WHAT IS YOUR EARLIEST HUMAN MEMORY?

Swimming in the collective unconscious and suddenly being sucked down into Hell.

Dis-le moi… dis-le moi, océan (à moi seul, pour ne pas attrister ceux qui n’ont encore connu que les illusions), et si le souffle de Satan crée les tempêtes qui soulèvent tes eaux salées jusqu’aux nuages.

maddieatsbrains:

felolenenok:

lol come at me bro I saw you just started following me- ‘stickydrama’- and if you’re going to threaten freelice why not start with me eh? you’re about as threatening as a chainletter warning me of ‘untold bad luck’ if I don’t forward to ‘7 friends right away!!’.

You are way…

"Like all freelicers"
Last time I checked, I use my personal blog when I voice against Felice Fawn. Don’t generalise.

Your personal blog is just that, a personal blog—i.e. not a Freelice blog.

Do you consider yourself a Freelicer? By the electrostatic balls of Thor, why?! Well, we all have our guilty little pleasures. (Myself, I lick boys’ assholes.) I hate to break it to you, but unless you run another blog that entirely masks your personality and is exclusively devoted to trashing Felice, you are not a Freelicer. I can see that you agree with Freelicers’ posts; but mere agreement with their posts does not a Freelicer make, just as disliking Felice does not a Freelicer make. You don’t even have a single image of Felice on your blog’s first page, whereas the hallmark of Freelice is an obsessive fixation with her. No one could guess that you have any interest in Freelice by glancing at your tumblr.

"All Freelicers" is not a generalization in this case, because the definition of a Freelicer encompasses those traits. You do not have those traits because you are not a Freelicer, unless you operate a more conventional Freelice blog. If you do operate a Freelice blog, I suppose then I will admit to generalizing. However, even if you have an alternate blog, all Freelicers are guilty of the same overall offenses by virtue of espousing the Freelice ideology and supporting its members. The typical Freelice mantra of “we are all individuals, so do not impute Freelice’s behavior as a group to any one Freelicer” is not a tenable position. Not in American jurisprudence, anyway. Guilt by association, or association-in-fact, is a well-established doctrine that has been used to prosecute individuals who belong to members of an illicit group with no formal or official membership and who might not have actually committed a particular act for which they are charged. While I do not hold all Freelicers accountable for every single Freelice post, I do hold all Freelicers accountable for Freelice’s core tactics of harassment.

What devilry is this? A young woman who isn’t Felice Fawn dares to speak out against Freelice?
Freelice is beginning to experience the Internet’s usual way of handling anyone who attracts a large audience: introducing you a billion folks who think you’re full of shit.
Don’t worry, girls, it happens to the best of us.

What devilry is this? A young woman who isn’t Felice Fawn dares to speak out against Freelice?

Freelice is beginning to experience the Internet’s usual way of handling anyone who attracts a large audience: introducing you a billion folks who think you’re full of shit.

Don’t worry, girls, it happens to the best of us.

i reblog a blog that keeps saying im some freelice blog called feliceflawed or w.e? i dont own a freelice blog. theyre uploading photos of me and making fun of the way i look. im very upset.

the-truth-about-felice-fawn:

deamhan:

the-truth-about-felice-fawn:

You’re talking about la-porte-jarretelles right? Don’t worry, love. Just ignore them. They are still trying to stir up drama and get attention. But in reality, they are only showing how shallow and petty they really are, and also how horrendously poor their arguing skills are.

For what it’s worth, I think you’re gorgeous. And I’m certain I’m not the only one.

aW THANKS yeah im just dumbfounded they think i owned feliceflawed when they had a list of their admins on it?? but thank you will do i guess :-( i already sent them an ask politely asking to remove the photos but they’ve yet to do so 

Yeah, sadly they probably won’t remove the photos despite you asking politely. Just report the posts. I will do the same (and I encourage anyone reading to do so as well!).

When I was recently “doxed” by another useless, trifling blogger, la-porte-jarretelles re-posted the info even though I said right when it happened that the doxing info was not me and that was not my picture. So it’s not surprising to me that they believe you own a blog that you don’t. They’re just grasping at straws since they really sunk their whole ~mission~ against Freelice shortly after appearing in the tags. Having cohesive arguments and even being remotely correct in their information is apparently of little importance to them.

Like I said, they just keep showing what a sorry, desperate POS they really are. Just ignore them. You have NO reason to feel bad about yourself, though I totally understand why it is freaking you out. Just know that they are revealing more about themselves than they ever could about you. ;)

And everyone in prison is really innocent. Not surprising that everyone screams “NOT ME!” in these unpleasant situations. Unfortunately, almost nothing is clear-cut or absolute. When shit hits the fan, we are compelled to determine who is responsible by interpreting the evidence available at the time. Maybe that girl really does not operate any Freelice blog; but I can certain see evidence that she does, and no one will know for sure until the actual operator identifies herself. Your advice to that girl was nice. But nicer still would be to exonerate her revealing who does operate all the Freelice blogs.

Moreover, why don’t any Freelicers ever provide a legitimate reason for hiding their identity? Do you think that I am going to come kill you in your sleep and dip you in syrup for breakfast? Nonsense. I never physically harmed any of the bitches I exposed on efagz, although I did make life a tad miserable for them until they backed the fuck off my grill. 

By your reasoning, no one could be an investigative journalistic without working anonymously. Nor could we have any reporters: everyone should be too afraid of being killed by the subject of a critical news story. Yet not only do we have journalists and reporters who work under their real name; but anonymous reporters have zero credibility in journalism.

And your casual “I just don’t feel like it” is obviously bullshit. Provide a legitimate reason. You must have a reason for guarding something so closely for so long that is more complex than, “oh just cuz.”

We all know the reason. But we nevertheless want to hear you say it: "I don’t want to be held accountable for all the shit I post."

felicesaidwhut:

felolenenok:

lol come at me bro I saw you just started following me- ‘stickydrama’- and if you’re going to threaten freelice why not start with me eh? you’re about as threatening as a chainletter warning me of ‘untold bad luck’ if I don’t forward to ‘7 friends right away!!’.

You are way…

I’ve got a simple statement to reply to your bs Chris, it’s this.
A ‘freelicers’ identity has absolutely no relevance to them telling the truth about Felice Fawn. 
A ‘freelicer’ being anonymous doesn’t make everything they say a lie. And giving out their info doesn’t stop Felice from being a pile of crap.
Thank you, and goodnight!

Anyone with an advanced education knows that your first two points are  incorrect.

A person’s identity has everything to do with his or her motivations and worldview. No one is capable of pure logical reason uncolored by emotions, prejudice, past experience; and even if such a human exists, he or she does not waste time posting about Felice Fawn. Freelicers are immature bitches on tumblr, not autistic savants in Rain Man. For this reason, lawyers attempt to make their arguments before a judge whose background will make for a sympathetic decision-maker in a case. And let’s be honest, those Freelicers whose identity has been exposed have always been far less photogenic than Felice, which reinforces the jealousy angle. Maybe all the remaining Freelicers really are as I’ve seen them write: sexy goddesses who want impressionable young girls to know that voluptuous women are more attractive than unhealthy toothpicks. But without knowing who they are, they might just as likely be jealous cunts.

Anonymous sources are furthermore notoriously unreliable and accordingly deserve very little credibility.  Not to be the stereotypical law student, but again, in Evidence anonymous sources are given very little weight. Sure, not everythingthat Freelicers say is a lie. But nearly all of it is highly suspect. I know, you provide “proof” for all your claims. No you don’t. You provide evidence, which you then interpret by drawing inferences. And your identity is a huge factor in making those inferences. I find most Freelicers’ interpretations to be very biased, irrationally so.

Those two points are taught in law school, but you don’t need to be a lawyer to know the truth. Google is your friend.

As for Felice, she is only remotely related to my point. I have repeatedly stated that I do not have a high opinion of her. But I have a much worse opinion of Freelice’s tactics, and individual Freelicers will indeed temper their conduct with a dose of practical self-interest once their identity is known to the subjects of their so-called truth. I have seen this unsurprising phenomenon occur many times on Stickam, and you Freelicers also noticed it on tumblr when dishonfreelice worked his or her magic. The simple truth is that people behave like savage animals whenever they risk no accountability or consequences for their actions.

Freelicers abuse their anonymity by acting far crueler than they will dare once their identity is known. But nothing is really anonymous on the internet. If anyone really wants to find you, they can. You just have to provide a reason. And Freelicers’ actions are reason enough for me.

Finally, you can huff and puff and say YOU’RE STUPID, MR. STICKYDRAMA all you want. But simply refuting my point is not very convincing. If shame and fear do not cause you to cling to your precious anonymity, then why do you? Why hide if you have nothing to fear? Why not attach your name to your supposedly noble cause? What say you to that?

felolenenok:

Working til 930 will respond later sweet cheeks.

Looking forward to it, honey buns.